← All Comparisons

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Grok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.80$3.00+275%
Output / 1M tokens$4.00$15.00+275%
Context window200K128K
Max output8.192K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Grok 4
MMLU-Pro69.4%86%
HumanEval88.1%93%
GPQA72%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5Grok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Grok 4 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons