← All Comparisons

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Large 3

A detailed comparison of Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Large 3Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.80$2.00+150%
Output / 1M tokens$4.00$5.00+25%
Context window200K128K
Max output8.192K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Large 3
MMLU-Pro69.4%83%
HumanEval88.1%91%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Large 3
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Mistral Large 3 Strengths

  • Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
  • Strong multilingual support
  • European data sovereignty option

Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses

  • Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
  • Smaller ecosystem

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Mistral Large 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (87.0% avg).

Larger context: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Large 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons