← All Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 FlashDifference
Input / 1M tokens$5.00$0.15-97%
Output / 1M tokens$25.00$0.60-98%
Context window200K1M
Max output32K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Flash
MMLU-Pro89.5%76%
HumanEval95%89.5%
GPQA75.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Flash
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths

  • One of the cheapest models available
  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Free tier available

Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses

  • Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
  • Output quality inconsistent on edge cases

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.7% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons