← All Comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-4o Mini
A detailed comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-4o Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.15 | -95% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $0.60 | -96% |
| Context window | 200K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86% | 68% |
| HumanEval | 94% | 87.2% |
| GPQA | 70% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- ✓Opus 4.5 quality at 1/5th the cost
- ✓Best value for production workloads
- ✓1M context in beta
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Weaknesses
- ✗Long context pricing doubles above 200K
- ✗Slightly below Opus 4.6 on hardest tasks
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.3% avg).
Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens.
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.