← All Comparisons

DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek R1GPT-5.3 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.55$2.00+264%
Output / 1M tokens$2.19$16.00+631%
Context window128K200K
Max output64K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek R1GPT-5.3 Codex
MMLU-Pro84%90%
HumanEval92%96.5%
GPQA71.5%78%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek R1GPT-5.3 Codex
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

DeepSeek R1 Strengths

  • Cheapest reasoning model available
  • Strong math and science performance
  • Open-source with off-peak discounts

DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses

  • Slower than non-reasoning models
  • No vision or tool-use
  • China-based — availability concerns

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option at $0.55/$2.19 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Larger context: GPT-5.3 Codex supports 200K tokens.

Choose DeepSeek R1 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons