← All Comparisons

DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3Gemini 2.5 ProDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.14$1.25+793%
Output / 1M tokens$0.28$10.00+3471%
Context window164K1M
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Gemini 2.5 Pro
MMLU-Pro78%87.5%
HumanEval89%93.5%
GPQA76%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3Gemini 2.5 Pro
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

DeepSeek V3 Strengths

  • Cheapest capable model available
  • Strong coding performance
  • Open-source

DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses

  • No vision support
  • Smaller context than competitors
  • China-based — availability concerns

Gemini 2.5 Pro Strengths

  • Competitive pricing for its capabilities
  • 1M context window
  • Well-tested and stable

Gemini 2.5 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by Gemini 3 Pro

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.7% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons