← All Comparisons

DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 3 Flash

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3 Flash (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3Gemini 3 FlashDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.14$0.50+257%
Output / 1M tokens$0.28$3.00+971%
Context window164K1M
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Gemini 3 Flash
MMLU-Pro78%78%
HumanEval89%90%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3Gemini 3 Flash
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

DeepSeek V3 Strengths

  • Cheapest capable model available
  • Strong coding performance
  • Open-source

DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses

  • No vision support
  • Smaller context than competitors
  • China-based — availability concerns

Gemini 3 Flash Strengths

  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Very fast
  • Free tier available via Google AI Studio

Gemini 3 Flash Weaknesses

  • Less capable than Pro on complex reasoning
  • Audio input priced separately ($1/1M)

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (84.0% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Flash if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons