← All Comparisons

DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-4o Mini

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3GPT-4o MiniDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.14$0.15+7%
Output / 1M tokens$0.28$0.60+114%
Context window164K128K
Max output16.384K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3GPT-4o Mini
MMLU-Pro78%68%
HumanEval89%87.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek V3GPT-4o Mini
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

DeepSeek V3 Strengths

  • Cheapest capable model available
  • Strong coding performance
  • Open-source

DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses

  • No vision support
  • Smaller context than competitors
  • China-based — availability concerns

GPT-4o Mini Strengths

  • Extremely cheap
  • Fast responses
  • Good enough for many production tasks

GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses

  • Weaker reasoning than full models
  • Can hallucinate more on complex topics

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek V3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.5% avg).

Larger context: DeepSeek V3 supports 164K tokens.

Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o Mini if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons