← All Comparisons
DeepSeek V3 vs Llama 4 Scout
A detailed comparison of DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.14 | $0.18 | +29% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.28 | $0.63 | +125% |
| Context window | 164K | 10M | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 78% | 74.2% |
| HumanEval | 89% | 86% |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek V3 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✗ | ✓ |
DeepSeek V3 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest capable model available
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Open-source
DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses
- ✗No vision support
- ✗Smaller context than competitors
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓10M token context — largest available
- ✓Open-source
- ✓Ultra cheap via API providers
Llama 4 Scout Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than Maverick
- ✗Limited tool-use support
Quick Verdict
Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek V3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.5% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens.
Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose Llama 4 Scout if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.