← All Comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex
A detailed comparison of Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) and GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash | GPT-5.3 Codex | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $2.00 | +1233% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $16.00 | +2567% |
| Context window | 1M | 200K | — |
| Max output | 65.536K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 76% | 90% |
| HumanEval | 89.5% | 96.5% |
| GPQA | — | 78% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 2.5 Flash | GPT-5.3 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths
- ✓One of the cheapest models available
- ✓1M context at budget pricing
- ✓Free tier available
Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
- ✗Output quality inconsistent on edge cases
GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths
- ✓Best coding model from OpenAI
- ✓Large output window (65K tokens)
- ✓Strong reasoning for complex tasks
GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses
- ✗API access not yet available
- ✗Premium pricing
Quick Verdict
Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).
Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M tokens.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.