← All Comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

A detailed comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProClaude Sonnet 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$1.25$3.00+140%
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$15.00+50%
Context window1M200K
Max output65.536K16K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProClaude Sonnet 4.5
MMLU-Pro87.5%84.5%
HumanEval93.5%93%
GPQA76%68.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 2.5 ProClaude Sonnet 4.5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 2.5 Pro Strengths

  • Competitive pricing for its capabilities
  • 1M context window
  • Well-tested and stable

Gemini 2.5 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by Gemini 3 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths

  • Well-tested and stable
  • Strong coding and analysis

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
  • Same price as the newer model

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 2.5 Pro is the more affordable option at $1.25/$10 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.7% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons