← All Comparisons

Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-4o Mini

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Flash (Google) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 FlashGPT-4o MiniDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.50$0.15-70%
Output / 1M tokens$3.00$0.60-80%
Context window1M128K
Max output65.536K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashGPT-4o Mini
MMLU-Pro78%68%
HumanEval90%87.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3 FlashGPT-4o Mini
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3 Flash Strengths

  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Very fast
  • Free tier available via Google AI Studio

Gemini 3 Flash Weaknesses

  • Less capable than Pro on complex reasoning
  • Audio input priced separately ($1/1M)

GPT-4o Mini Strengths

  • Extremely cheap
  • Fast responses
  • Good enough for many production tasks

GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses

  • Weaker reasoning than full models
  • Can hallucinate more on complex topics

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (84.0% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Flash if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons