← All Comparisons
Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Flash (Google) and Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.50 | $0.31 | -38% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $0.85 | -72% |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | — |
| Max output | 65.536K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 78% | 80.5% |
| HumanEval | 90% | 90.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Gemini 3 Flash | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✗ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Gemini 3 Flash Strengths
- ✓1M context at budget pricing
- ✓Very fast
- ✓Free tier available via Google AI Studio
Gemini 3 Flash Weaknesses
- ✗Less capable than Pro on complex reasoning
- ✗Audio input priced separately ($1/1M)
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Flash if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.