← All Comparisons

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.6

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.6Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$5.00+150%
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$25.00+108%
Context window1M200K
Max output64K32K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.6
MMLU-Pro91%89.5%
HumanEval95%95%
GPQA94.3%75.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.6
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • #1 on 12 of 18 tracked benchmarks
  • 94.3% GPQA Diamond — highest of any model
  • Same price as Gemini 3 Pro (free upgrade)
  • 1M context with configurable thinking levels

Gemini 3.1 Pro Weaknesses

  • Still in preview
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more affordable option at $2/$12 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (93.4% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons