← All Comparisons
GLM-4.7 vs DeepSeek R1
A detailed comparison of GLM-4.7 (Zhipu AI) and DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GLM-4.7 | DeepSeek R1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.55 | -8% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.20 | $2.19 | -0% |
| Context window | 200K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | 64K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | 84% |
| HumanEval | — | 92% |
| GPQA | 85.7% | 71.5% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GLM-4.7 | DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✗ |
GLM-4.7 Strengths
- ✓Excellent value — strong benchmarks at $0.60/$2.20
- ✓Open-weight (MIT license)
- ✓Top scores on AIME 25 and BrowseComp
GLM-4.7 Weaknesses
- ✗No tool-use support yet
- ✗358B parameters — still heavy for self-hosting
- ✗Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Quick Verdict
Best value: DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option at $0.55/$2.19 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GLM-4.7 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.0% avg).
Larger context: GLM-4.7 supports 200K tokens.
Choose DeepSeek R1 if cost matters most. Choose GLM-4.7 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.