← All Comparisons

GLM-5 vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGLM-5Grok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$1.00$3.00+200%
Output / 1M tokens$3.20$15.00+369%
Context window200K128K
Max output128K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGLM-5Grok 4
MMLU-Pro70.4%86%
HumanEval91%93%
GPQA72%72%

Capabilities

CapabilityGLM-5Grok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

GLM-5 Strengths

  • Open-weight (MIT license) — self-hostable
  • 77.8% SWE-Bench Verified — top-tier coding
  • 128K max output — huge generation window

GLM-5 Weaknesses

  • MMLU-Pro lags behind Western flagships
  • 744B parameters — heavy to self-host
  • China-based — availability concerns

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: GLM-5 is the more affordable option at $1/$3.2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Grok 4 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.7% avg).

Larger context: GLM-5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose GLM-5 if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons