← All Comparisons

GPT-5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

A detailed comparison of GPT-5 (OpenAI) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-5Claude Opus 4.6Difference
Input / 1M tokens$1.25$5.00+300%
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$25.00+150%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K32K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-5Claude Opus 4.6
MMLU-Pro88.5%89.5%
HumanEval95%95%
GPQA73.5%75.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-5Claude Opus 4.6
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-5 Strengths

  • Strong all-around performance
  • Good price for flagship tier
  • Multimodal including audio

GPT-5 Weaknesses

  • 128K context vs 200K+ for newer models
  • Codex variants better for pure coding

Claude Opus 4.6 Strengths

  • Best-in-class agentic tool use and coding
  • 1M context available in beta (Tier 4)
  • Strong at following complex multi-step instructions

Claude Opus 4.6 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing ($10/$37.50 at 1M context)
  • 1M context beta is Tier 4 only

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-5 is the more affordable option at $1.25/$10 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Opus 4.6 supports 200K tokens.

Choose GPT-5 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons