← All Comparisons
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
A detailed comparison of GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-5.2 Codex | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.75 | $3.00 | +71% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $14.00 | $15.00 | +7% |
| Context window | 200K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 65.536K | 16K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Codex | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 89% | 84.5% |
| HumanEval | 95.5% | 93% |
| GPQA | 76% | 68.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-5.2 Codex | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Available via API now
- ✓200K context window
GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by 5.3
- ✗Higher output cost than some competitors
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths
- ✓Well-tested and stable
- ✓Strong coding and analysis
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
- ✗Same price as the newer model
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-5.2 Codex is the more affordable option at $1.75/$14 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.8% avg).
Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.