← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4o Mini
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Scout (Meta) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-4o Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.18 | $0.15 | -17% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.63 | $0.60 | -5% |
| Context window | 10M | 128K | — |
| Max output | 32K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 74.2% | 68% |
| HumanEval | 86% | 87.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓10M token context — largest available
- ✓Open-source
- ✓Ultra cheap via API providers
Llama 4 Scout Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than Maverick
- ✗Limited tool-use support
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Scout scores higher on average across available benchmarks (80.1% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens.
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Llama 4 Scout if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.