← All Comparisons

MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-4o

A detailed comparison of MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) and GPT-4o (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5GPT-4oDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.30$2.50+733%
Output / 1M tokens$1.20$10.00+733%
Context window200K128K
Max output128K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5GPT-4o
MMLU-Pro82%80.5%
HumanEval90%91%
GPQA64.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityMiniMax M2.5GPT-4o
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

MiniMax M2.5 Strengths

  • Frontier quality at budget pricing ($0.30/$1.20)
  • 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified — among the best
  • Open-source (MIT) with 10B active params — easy to run

MiniMax M2.5 Weaknesses

  • Text-only — no vision or audio
  • No tool-use support
  • Newer provider — smaller ecosystem

GPT-4o Strengths

  • Well-established and reliable
  • Large ecosystem of tools and integrations

GPT-4o Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by GPT-5 series
  • Higher price than newer, better alternatives

Quick Verdict

Best value: MiniMax M2.5 is the more affordable option at $0.3/$1.2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.0% avg).

Larger context: MiniMax M2.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose MiniMax M2.5 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-4o if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons