← All Comparisons
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-4o Mini
A detailed comparison of MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | MiniMax M2.5 | GPT-4o Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.15 | -50% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 | $0.60 | -50% |
| Context window | 200K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 82% | 68% |
| HumanEval | 90% | 87.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | MiniMax M2.5 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✗ | ✓ |
MiniMax M2.5 Strengths
- ✓Frontier quality at budget pricing ($0.30/$1.20)
- ✓80.2% SWE-Bench Verified — among the best
- ✓Open-source (MIT) with 10B active params — easy to run
MiniMax M2.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Text-only — no vision or audio
- ✗No tool-use support
- ✗Newer provider — smaller ecosystem
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.0% avg).
Larger context: MiniMax M2.5 supports 200K tokens.
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose MiniMax M2.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.