← All Comparisons

MiniMax M2.5 vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMiniMax M2.5Grok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.30$3.00+900%
Output / 1M tokens$1.20$15.00+1150%
Context window200K128K
Max output128K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMiniMax M2.5Grok 4
MMLU-Pro82%86%
HumanEval90%93%
GPQA72%

Capabilities

CapabilityMiniMax M2.5Grok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

MiniMax M2.5 Strengths

  • Frontier quality at budget pricing ($0.30/$1.20)
  • 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified — among the best
  • Open-source (MIT) with 10B active params — easy to run

MiniMax M2.5 Weaknesses

  • Text-only — no vision or audio
  • No tool-use support
  • Newer provider — smaller ecosystem

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: MiniMax M2.5 is the more affordable option at $0.3/$1.2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.0% avg).

Larger context: MiniMax M2.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose MiniMax M2.5 if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons