← All Comparisons

Mistral Medium 3 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of Mistral Medium 3 (Mistral) and GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3GPT-5.3 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.40$2.00+400%
Output / 1M tokens$2.00$16.00+700%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkMistral Medium 3GPT-5.3 Codex
MMLU-Pro76%90%
HumanEval87%96.5%
GPQA78%

Capabilities

CapabilityMistral Medium 3GPT-5.3 Codex
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Mistral Medium 3 Strengths

  • Very affordable for mid-tier quality
  • Good multilingual performance

Mistral Medium 3 Weaknesses

  • Lags behind on reasoning benchmarks
  • Smaller community and tooling

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Quick Verdict

Best value: Mistral Medium 3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$2 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Larger context: GPT-5.3 Codex supports 200K tokens.

Choose Mistral Medium 3 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons