← All Comparisons
o3 vs GPT-5.2 Codex
A detailed comparison of o3 (OpenAI) and GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | o3 | GPT-5.2 Codex | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.40 | $1.75 | +338% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.60 | $14.00 | +775% |
| Context window | 200K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | o3 | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 87% | 89% |
| HumanEval | 94.5% | 95.5% |
| GPQA | 79.2% | 76% |
Capabilities
| Capability | o3 | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
o3 Strengths
- ✓Recently repriced — now very cheap
- ✓Excellent logical reasoning
- ✓200K context window
o3 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower due to reasoning overhead
- ✗Overkill for simple tasks
GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Available via API now
- ✓200K context window
GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by 5.3
- ✗Higher output cost than some competitors
Quick Verdict
Best value: o3 is the more affordable option at $0.4/$1.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: o3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).
Choose o3 if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.