← All Comparisons
o4-mini vs GPT-5.2 Codex
A detailed comparison of o4-mini (OpenAI) and GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | o4-mini | GPT-5.2 Codex | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.10 | $1.75 | +59% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $4.40 | $14.00 | +218% |
| Context window | 200K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | o4-mini | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 85% | 89% |
| HumanEval | 93.5% | 95.5% |
| GPQA | 76% | 76% |
Capabilities
| Capability | o4-mini | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
o4-mini Strengths
- ✓Affordable reasoning model
- ✓200K context window
- ✓Good for math and science
o4-mini Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗Reasoning tokens add to effective cost
GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Available via API now
- ✓200K context window
GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by 5.3
- ✗Higher output cost than some competitors
Quick Verdict
Best value: o4-mini is the more affordable option at $1.1/$4.4 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.8% avg).
Choose o4-mini if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.