← All Comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
A detailed comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $3.00 | — |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $15.00 | — |
| Context window | 200K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16K | 16K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84.5% | 86% |
| HumanEval | 93% | 94% |
| GPQA | 68.2% | 70% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths
- ✓Well-tested and stable
- ✓Strong coding and analysis
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
- ✗Same price as the newer model
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- ✓Opus 4.5 quality at 1/5th the cost
- ✓Best value for production workloads
- ✓1M context in beta
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Weaknesses
- ✗Long context pricing doubles above 200K
- ✗Slightly below Opus 4.6 on hardest tasks
Quick Verdict
Best value: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the more affordable option at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.3% avg).
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.