← All Comparisons

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-4o

A detailed comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-4o (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-4oDifference
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$2.50-17%
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$10.00-33%
Context window200K128K
Max output16K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-4o
MMLU-Pro84.5%80.5%
HumanEval93%91%
GPQA68.2%64.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-4o
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths

  • Well-tested and stable
  • Strong coding and analysis

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
  • Same price as the newer model

GPT-4o Strengths

  • Well-established and reliable
  • Large ecosystem of tools and integrations

GPT-4o Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by GPT-5 series
  • Higher price than newer, better alternatives

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o is the more affordable option at $2.5/$10 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.9% avg).

Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose GPT-4o if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons