← All Comparisons

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$3.00$3.00
Output / 1M tokens$15.00$15.00
Context window200K128K
Max output16K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4
MMLU-Pro84.5%86%
HumanEval93%93%
GPQA68.2%72%

Capabilities

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths

  • Well-tested and stable
  • Strong coding and analysis

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
  • Same price as the newer model

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: Grok 4 is the more affordable option at $3/$15 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Grok 4 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.7% avg).

Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose Grok 4 if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons