← All Comparisons
DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3
A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | DeepSeek V3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.55 | $0.14 | -75% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.19 | $0.28 | -87% |
| Context window | 128K | 164K | — |
| Max output | 64K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84% | 78% |
| HumanEval | 92% | 89% |
| GPQA | 71.5% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
DeepSeek V3 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest capable model available
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Open-source
DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses
- ✗No vision support
- ✗Smaller context than competitors
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Quick Verdict
Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek V3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.5% avg).
Larger context: DeepSeek V3 supports 164K tokens.
Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose DeepSeek R1 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.