← All Comparisons
DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.55 | $0.15 | -73% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.19 | $0.60 | -73% |
| Context window | 128K | 1M | — |
| Max output | 64K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84% | 76% |
| HumanEval | 92% | 89.5% |
| GPQA | 71.5% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✗ | ✓ |
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths
- ✓One of the cheapest models available
- ✓1M context at budget pricing
- ✓Free tier available
Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
- ✗Output quality inconsistent on edge cases
Quick Verdict
Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (82.8% avg).
Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M tokens.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose DeepSeek R1 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.