← All Comparisons

DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 3 Flash

A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Gemini 3 Flash (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricDeepSeek R1Gemini 3 FlashDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.55$0.50-9%
Output / 1M tokens$2.19$3.00+37%
Context window128K1M
Max output64K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkDeepSeek R1Gemini 3 Flash
MMLU-Pro84%78%
HumanEval92%90%
GPQA71.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityDeepSeek R1Gemini 3 Flash
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

DeepSeek R1 Strengths

  • Cheapest reasoning model available
  • Strong math and science performance
  • Open-source with off-peak discounts

DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses

  • Slower than non-reasoning models
  • No vision or tool-use
  • China-based — availability concerns

Gemini 3 Flash Strengths

  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Very fast
  • Free tier available via Google AI Studio

Gemini 3 Flash Weaknesses

  • Less capable than Pro on complex reasoning
  • Audio input priced separately ($1/1M)

Quick Verdict

Best value: DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option at $0.55/$2.19 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on average across available benchmarks (84.0% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose DeepSeek R1 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Flash if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons