← All Comparisons
DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-4.7
A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and GLM-4.7 (Zhipu AI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.55 | $0.60 | +9% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.19 | $2.20 | +0% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 64K | 128K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84% | 84.3% |
| HumanEval | 92% | — |
| GPQA | 71.5% | 85.7% |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✗ | ✓ |
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
GLM-4.7 Strengths
- ✓Excellent value — strong benchmarks at $0.60/$2.20
- ✓Open-weight (MIT license)
- ✓Top scores on AIME 25 and BrowseComp
GLM-4.7 Weaknesses
- ✗No tool-use support yet
- ✗358B parameters — still heavy for self-hosting
- ✗Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic
Quick Verdict
Best value: DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option at $0.55/$2.19 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GLM-4.7 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.0% avg).
Larger context: GLM-4.7 supports 200K tokens.
Choose DeepSeek R1 if cost matters most. Choose GLM-4.7 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.