← All Comparisons
DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-5
A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.55 | $1.00 | +82% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.19 | $3.20 | +46% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 64K | 128K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84% | 70.4% |
| HumanEval | 92% | 91% |
| GPQA | 71.5% | 72% |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✗ | ✓ |
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
GLM-5 Strengths
- ✓Open-weight (MIT license) — self-hostable
- ✓77.8% SWE-Bench Verified — top-tier coding
- ✓128K max output — huge generation window
GLM-5 Weaknesses
- ✗MMLU-Pro lags behind Western flagships
- ✗744B parameters — heavy to self-host
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Quick Verdict
Best value: DeepSeek R1 is the more affordable option at $0.55/$2.19 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek R1 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (82.5% avg).
Larger context: GLM-5 supports 200K tokens.
Choose DeepSeek R1 if cost matters most. Choose GLM-5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.