← All Comparisons
DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-4o Mini
A detailed comparison of DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | GPT-4o Mini | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.55 | $0.15 | -73% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $2.19 | $0.60 | -73% |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | — |
| Max output | 64K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | DeepSeek R1 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 84% | 68% |
| HumanEval | 92% | 87.2% |
| GPQA | 71.5% | — |
Capabilities
| Capability | DeepSeek R1 | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✗ | ✓ |
DeepSeek R1 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest reasoning model available
- ✓Strong math and science performance
- ✓Open-source with off-peak discounts
DeepSeek R1 Weaknesses
- ✗Slower than non-reasoning models
- ✗No vision or tool-use
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: DeepSeek R1 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (82.5% avg).
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose DeepSeek R1 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.