← All Comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashGrok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.15$3.00+1900%
Output / 1M tokens$0.60$15.00+2400%
Context window1M128K
Max output65.536K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashGrok 4
MMLU-Pro76%86%
HumanEval89.5%93%
GPQA72%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 2.5 FlashGrok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths

  • One of the cheapest models available
  • 1M context at budget pricing
  • Free tier available

Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses

  • Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
  • Output quality inconsistent on edge cases

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Grok 4 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.7% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons