← All Comparisons

Gemini 3 Pro vs Claude Haiku 4.5

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Pro (Google) and Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 ProClaude Haiku 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.80-60%
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$4.00-67%
Context window1M200K
Max output65.536K8.192K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3 ProClaude Haiku 4.5
MMLU-Pro89.8%69.4%
HumanEval94%88.1%
GPQA77%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3 ProClaude Haiku 4.5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3 Pro Strengths

  • Stable and well-tested
  • 1M token context window
  • Strong multimodal with audio

Gemini 3 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 3.1 Pro
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Very fast responses
  • Cheapest Anthropic option
  • Good for classification and extraction

Claude Haiku 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Weakest reasoning in the Claude family
  • Can struggle with nuanced instructions

Quick Verdict

Best value: Claude Haiku 4.5 is the more affordable option at $0.8/$4 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons