← All Comparisons

Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.2 Codex

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3 Pro (Google) and GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3 ProGPT-5.2 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$1.75-13%
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$14.00+17%
Context window1M200K
Max output65.536K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.2 Codex
MMLU-Pro89.8%89%
HumanEval94%95.5%
GPQA77%76%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3 ProGPT-5.2 Codex
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3 Pro Strengths

  • Stable and well-tested
  • 1M token context window
  • Strong multimodal with audio

Gemini 3 Pro Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 3.1 Pro
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths

  • Strong coding performance
  • Available via API now
  • 200K context window

GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by 5.3
  • Higher output cost than some competitors

Quick Verdict

Best value: Gemini 3 Pro is the more affordable option at $2/$12 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.9% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons