← All Comparisons

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-4o Mini

A detailed comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) and GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGemini 3.1 ProGPT-4o MiniDifference
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$0.15-93%
Output / 1M tokens$12.00$0.60-95%
Context window1M128K
Max output64K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProGPT-4o Mini
MMLU-Pro91%68%
HumanEval95%87.2%
GPQA94.3%

Capabilities

CapabilityGemini 3.1 ProGPT-4o Mini
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Gemini 3.1 Pro Strengths

  • #1 on 12 of 18 tracked benchmarks
  • 94.3% GPQA Diamond — highest of any model
  • Same price as Gemini 3 Pro (free upgrade)
  • 1M context with configurable thinking levels

Gemini 3.1 Pro Weaknesses

  • Still in preview
  • Context-tiered pricing ($4/$18 above 200K)

GPT-4o Mini Strengths

  • Extremely cheap
  • Fast responses
  • Good enough for many production tasks

GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses

  • Weaker reasoning than full models
  • Can hallucinate more on complex topics

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on average across available benchmarks (93.4% avg).

Larger context: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons