← All Comparisons
GPT-4o Mini vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o Mini | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.15 | $3.00 | +1900% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.60 | $15.00 | +2400% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o Mini | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 68% | 84.5% |
| HumanEval | 87.2% | 93% |
| GPQA | — | 68.2% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o Mini | Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Mini Strengths
- ✓Extremely cheap
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Good enough for many production tasks
GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker reasoning than full models
- ✗Can hallucinate more on complex topics
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths
- ✓Well-tested and stable
- ✓Strong coding and analysis
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
- ✗Same price as the newer model
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.9% avg).
Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens.
Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.