← All Comparisons

GPT-4o Mini vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) and GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-4o MiniGPT-5.3 CodexDifference
Input / 1M tokens$0.15$2.00+1233%
Output / 1M tokens$0.60$16.00+2567%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K65.536K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-4o MiniGPT-5.3 Codex
MMLU-Pro68%90%
HumanEval87.2%96.5%
GPQA78%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4o MiniGPT-5.3 Codex
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-4o Mini Strengths

  • Extremely cheap
  • Fast responses
  • Good enough for many production tasks

GPT-4o Mini Weaknesses

  • Weaker reasoning than full models
  • Can hallucinate more on complex topics

GPT-5.3 Codex Strengths

  • Best coding model from OpenAI
  • Large output window (65K tokens)
  • Strong reasoning for complex tasks

GPT-5.3 Codex Weaknesses

  • API access not yet available
  • Premium pricing

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o Mini is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (88.2% avg).

Larger context: GPT-5.3 Codex supports 200K tokens.

Choose GPT-4o Mini if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.3 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons