← All Comparisons

GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

A detailed comparison of GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricGPT-4oClaude Sonnet 4.5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$2.50$3.00+20%
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$15.00+50%
Context window128K200K
Max output16.384K16K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkGPT-4oClaude Sonnet 4.5
MMLU-Pro80.5%84.5%
HumanEval91%93%
GPQA64.2%68.2%

Capabilities

CapabilityGPT-4oClaude Sonnet 4.5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

GPT-4o Strengths

  • Well-established and reliable
  • Large ecosystem of tools and integrations

GPT-4o Weaknesses

  • Being superseded by GPT-5 series
  • Higher price than newer, better alternatives

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Strengths

  • Well-tested and stable
  • Strong coding and analysis

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Weaknesses

  • Superseded by Sonnet 4.6
  • Same price as the newer model

Quick Verdict

Best value: GPT-4o is the more affordable option at $2.5/$10 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (81.9% avg).

Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens.

Choose GPT-4o if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons