← All Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
A detailed comparison of GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | GPT-4o | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $2.50 | $3.00 | +20% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $15.00 | +50% |
| Context window | 128K | 200K | — |
| Max output | 16.384K | 16K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 86% |
| HumanEval | 91% | 94% |
| GPQA | 64.2% | 70% |
Capabilities
| Capability | GPT-4o | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| audio | ✓ | ✗ |
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
GPT-4o Strengths
- ✓Well-established and reliable
- ✓Large ecosystem of tools and integrations
GPT-4o Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by GPT-5 series
- ✗Higher price than newer, better alternatives
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Strengths
- ✓Opus 4.5 quality at 1/5th the cost
- ✓Best value for production workloads
- ✓1M context in beta
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Weaknesses
- ✗Long context pricing doubles above 200K
- ✗Slightly below Opus 4.6 on hardest tasks
Quick Verdict
Best value: GPT-4o is the more affordable option at $2.5/$10 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (83.3% avg).
Larger context: Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens.
Choose GPT-4o if cost matters most. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.