← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V3
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and DeepSeek V3 (DeepSeek) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | DeepSeek V3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.31 | $0.14 | -55% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $0.28 | -67% |
| Context window | 1M | 164K | — |
| Max output | 32K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 78% |
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 89% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | DeepSeek V3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✗ |
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
DeepSeek V3 Strengths
- ✓Cheapest capable model available
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Open-source
DeepSeek V3 Weaknesses
- ✗No vision support
- ✗Smaller context than competitors
- ✗China-based — availability concerns
Quick Verdict
Best value: DeepSeek V3 is the more affordable option at $0.14/$0.28 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.
Choose DeepSeek V3 if cost matters most. Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.