← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.2 Codex
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and GPT-5.2 Codex (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.2 Codex | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.31 | $1.75 | +465% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $14.00 | +1547% |
| Context window | 1M | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 89% |
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 95.5% |
| GPQA | — | 76% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
GPT-5.2 Codex Strengths
- ✓Strong coding performance
- ✓Available via API now
- ✓200K context window
GPT-5.2 Codex Weaknesses
- ✗Being superseded by 5.3
- ✗Higher output cost than some competitors
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.8% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5.2 Codex if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.