← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.31 | $0.15 | -52% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $0.60 | -29% |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | — |
| Max output | 32K | 65.536K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 76% |
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 89.5% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
Gemini 2.5 Flash Strengths
- ✓One of the cheapest models available
- ✓1M context at budget pricing
- ✓Free tier available
Gemini 2.5 Flash Weaknesses
- ✗Weaker than Flash 3 on most benchmarks
- ✗Output quality inconsistent on edge cases
Quick Verdict
Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the more affordable option at $0.15/$0.6 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if cost matters most. Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.