← All Comparisons

Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5

A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and GPT-5 (OpenAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.31$1.25+303%
Output / 1M tokens$0.85$10.00+1076%
Context window1M128K
Max output32K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5
MMLU-Pro80.5%88.5%
HumanEval90.2%95%
GPQA73.5%

Capabilities

CapabilityLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5
audio
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision

Llama 4 Maverick Strengths

  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • 1M context window
  • Very competitive via API providers

Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses

  • Requires significant compute to self-host
  • Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models

GPT-5 Strengths

  • Strong all-around performance
  • Good price for flagship tier
  • Multimodal including audio

GPT-5 Weaknesses

  • 128K context vs 200K+ for newer models
  • Codex variants better for pure coding

Quick Verdict

Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: GPT-5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.7% avg).

Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose GPT-5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons