← All Comparisons

Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Grok 4 (xAI) across pricing, performance, and features.

Pricing Comparison

MetricLlama 4 MaverickGrok 4Difference
Input / 1M tokens$0.31$3.00+868%
Output / 1M tokens$0.85$15.00+1665%
Context window1M128K
Max output32K16.384K

Benchmark Comparison

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickGrok 4
MMLU-Pro80.5%86%
HumanEval90.2%93%
GPQA72%

Capabilities

CapabilityLlama 4 MaverickGrok 4
code
reasoning
text
tool-use
vision
web-search

Llama 4 Maverick Strengths

  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • 1M context window
  • Very competitive via API providers

Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses

  • Requires significant compute to self-host
  • Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models

Grok 4 Strengths

  • Built-in web search and real-time data
  • Strong reasoning
  • $25 free credits for new users

Grok 4 Weaknesses

  • Premium pricing for its benchmark tier
  • Additional charges for tool invocations ($2.50-$5/1K calls)
  • Smaller ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic

Quick Verdict

Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.

Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).

Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose Grok 4 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.

More Comparisons