← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Llama 4 Scout (Meta) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.31 | $0.18 | -42% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $0.63 | -26% |
| Context window | 1M | 10M | — |
| Max output | 32K | 32K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 74.2% |
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 86% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓10M token context — largest available
- ✓Open-source
- ✓Ultra cheap via API providers
Llama 4 Scout Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than Maverick
- ✗Limited tool-use support
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Scout is the more affordable option at $0.18/$0.63 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on average across available benchmarks (85.3% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if cost matters most. Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.