← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs MiniMax M2.5
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and MiniMax M2.5 (MiniMax) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | MiniMax M2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.31 | $0.30 | -3% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $1.20 | +41% |
| Context window | 1M | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | 128K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 82% |
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 90% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | MiniMax M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✗ |
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
MiniMax M2.5 Strengths
- ✓Frontier quality at budget pricing ($0.30/$1.20)
- ✓80.2% SWE-Bench Verified — among the best
- ✓Open-source (MIT) with 10B active params — easy to run
MiniMax M2.5 Weaknesses
- ✗Text-only — no vision or audio
- ✗No tool-use support
- ✗Newer provider — smaller ecosystem
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (86.0% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose MiniMax M2.5 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.