← All Comparisons
Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Large 3
A detailed comparison of Llama 4 Maverick (Meta) and Mistral Large 3 (Mistral) across pricing, performance, and features.
Pricing Comparison
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.31 | $2.00 | +545% |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.85 | $5.00 | +488% |
| Context window | 1M | 128K | — |
| Max output | 32K | 16.384K | — |
Benchmark Comparison
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | 83% |
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 91% |
Capabilities
| Capability | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| code | ✓ | ✓ |
| reasoning | ✗ | ✓ |
| text | ✓ | ✓ |
| tool-use | ✗ | ✓ |
| vision | ✓ | ✓ |
Llama 4 Maverick Strengths
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓1M context window
- ✓Very competitive via API providers
Llama 4 Maverick Weaknesses
- ✗Requires significant compute to self-host
- ✗Fewer tool-use capabilities than proprietary models
Mistral Large 3 Strengths
- ✓Low output cost ($5/1M) for a flagship
- ✓Strong multilingual support
- ✓European data sovereignty option
Mistral Large 3 Weaknesses
- ✗Lower benchmarks than top-tier competitors
- ✗Smaller ecosystem
Quick Verdict
Best value: Llama 4 Maverick is the more affordable option at $0.31/$0.85 per 1M tokens.
Higher benchmarks: Mistral Large 3 scores higher on average across available benchmarks (87.0% avg).
Larger context: Llama 4 Maverick supports 1M tokens.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if cost matters most. Choose Mistral Large 3 if you need the best possible quality for complex tasks.